
Panasonic’s new LX3 doesn’t simply crop away bands of pixels along the edges of its sensor to achieve the various aspect ratios. Rather, the LX3 uses a relatively new technique first introduced in Panasonic’s TZ3. The sensor is larger than the imaging circle of the lens. For each aspect ratio, a slightly smaller central portion is cropped out of the sensor. In each case though, the diagonal equals the diameter of the lens’ imaging circle. Thus each aspect ratio offers the same angle of view: the LX3 features the same 24-60mm (35mm equivalent) zoom range at all 3 aspect ratios. As is evident in the diagram below, although the angle of view and focal length remain the same at each aspect ratio, the horizontal field of view increases as you move from 4:3 to 16:9, taking in more of the scene horizontally.
The LX3’s predecessor, the LX2 used a more conventional approach. The left side of the diagram shows how the various aspect ratios are achieved by cropping millions of pixels away on either side of the 16:9 sensor. In this manner, the angle of view is not maintained and the LX2 only offers a 28mm wide angle when shooting in 16:9. For those shooting mainly in 16:9 mode, the LX2 has a larger effective imaging area at 16:9 than the LX3 does.
The diagram also illustrates the relative sizes of the respective sensors and imaging circles. Although both cameras feature sensors with a the same 2.00 micron pixel pitch and approximately 10 megapixel effective resolution, the LX3 makes more efficient use of the (smaller) imaging circle. This, in addition to the smaller zoom range, probably allowed for the LX3's lens to be much brighter while maintaining its compact dimensions.
A larger version of this diagram can be found here: http://www.pbase.com/viztyger/test
Panasonic LX3 vs LX2: Relative Sensor Sizes and Effective Sensor Areas per Aspect Ratio
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Panasonic LX3 vs LX2: Relative Sensor Sizes and Effective Sensor Areas per Aspect Ratio
2008-07-22T14:49:00-05:00
Björn Utpott
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
-
▼
2009
(68)
-
►
June
(14)
- Olympus E-P1 London Launch & Hands-on
- Sigma Answers the Call! Waiting for Olympus...
- Interested in Seeing an E-P1 - DP2 Shootout?
- Can't Get Enough E-P1?
- Olympus 17mm f/2.8 Samples at LensTip.com
- Olympus E-P1 Thoughts
- Olympus E-P1 Body Only and Kits Available for Pre-...
- Olympus Implements Software Lens Distortion Correc...
- More news Olympus E-P1
- 'Point and Shoot Cameras (P&S) versus DSLRs' at Th...
- DP2 Part 1 Review at Reid Reviews
- Sigma DP2 Review by Jim Radcliffe
- Olympus E-P1
- Best Compact for Street Photography?
-
►
May
(11)
- Overlooked Serious Compacts
- Compact DSLRs Just Got More Serious
- Slightly OT: Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8 Compared to AF ...
- Raising Prices in Response to Limited Supply: Pric...
- June 15th
- A Note About Pre-Ordering from Amazon
- First Part of Ongoing DP2 Review Posted at Lensist...
- More Olympus Micro Four Thirds Teasers
- Serious Compacts Hall of Fame
- First Sigma DP2 Batch Shipped from Amazon
- Teaser Tweets Touting Olympus Micro Four Thirds
-
►
April
(20)
- iPhone as Art - The iPhone Photography of Chase Ja...
- Sigma DP2 Performance Improvements
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 1
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 2
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 3
- Do You Have a Great Local Camera Store?
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 4
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 5
- Sigma DP2 Samples at Carl Rytterfalk Photography
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 6
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 7
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 8
- How Low Can the E-420 Price Go?
- Reintroducing Camera Work
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 9
- Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 10
- Easter Confessional about point and shoot cameras....
- Featured Photographer: Byron Edwards
- Camera Deals Blog
- Sigma DP1 for $400 at Amazon - Today Only!
-
►
June
(14)








