|
|
7Thanks
-
5
Post By Gizmo
-
2
Post By Luckypenguin
-
June 20th, 2012, 02:38 AM
#1
G1X does exactly what I ask of it.
Works fine when I don't want to drag out the big gun.
 
-
June 20th, 2012, 04:23 AM
#2
I really think that Canon crippled this by calling it a "G" series camera.
It's an awful lot more ; there's a gem of a camera trying to come out.
Last edited by nippa; June 20th, 2012 at 04:52 AM.
-
June 20th, 2012, 07:03 AM
#3
The "G" label is appropriate though. It literally is a pumped-up G12 with a big sensor, with all the good and bad that that description entails.
Nic (Canonite, Olympian, Panasonian, Samsunite) ~flickr~
-
June 20th, 2012, 08:19 AM
#4
I thought G-plan was furniture?
-
June 20th, 2012, 09:48 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by nippa
I really think that Canon crippled this by calling it a "G" series camera.
It's an awful lot more ; there's a gem of a camera trying to come out.
The G has always been Canon's flagship enthusiast camera and was really without peer for its first 7 or 8 years; my surprise was that they continue to have the lower rung G12 as well. Appears they're doing what they did with the xxD line of DSLRs, where the 50D split to form the upper tier 7D and the lower tier 60D.
I've always loved my Canon G's, right up through the G10. Didn't care for the build quality of the G11/12, and then along came μ43. Looks like I might have to give the G1x a more careful consideration. Great work displayed here!
Chuck
-
June 22nd, 2012, 01:40 AM
#6
The G1X has surprised me since I bought it, it's handling and performance is way above what I was expecting :-)
Current gear: Panasonic LX7, Fuji X100, Fuji X-E1, Fuji XP50
-
June 22nd, 2012, 02:23 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by Crsnydertx
..
I've always loved my Canon G's, right up through the G10. Didn't care for the build quality of the G11/12, and then along came μ43. Looks like I might have to give the G1x a more careful consideration. Great work displayed here!
I liked the G11 I had, and a friend has the G9 which is also very very nice... the G1x appeals but I really really wish Canon had done better with the optical VF. The argument that a larger body would have been required (which I seem to recall someone, cant remember who, saying) just falls over when you look at what fuji has done with theirs. Hope Canon does something about it in its next iteration... I'll buy for sure.
-
July 8th, 2012, 08:14 PM
#8
If I need an optical view finder I just drag out the 1D Mk III.

Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|