|
|
217Thanks
-
November 18th, 2012, 10:13 PM
#121
You're right, John. Files from the original 12mp micro four-thirds sensors and even the GH2 tend to be a bit on the "brittle" side. The latest sensors from Sony (and whatever Panasonic may unveil next) might be different. That's why I tend to shoot jpgs only with my micro four-thirds equipment. But I think you've helped me make up my mind about the K-01. Thanks; I'll let you know.
Panasonic G5 and GX1; Lumix 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6, Lumix 45-150mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 100-300mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 14mm f/2.5, Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Olympus E-PM2; Zuiko 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6, 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R, Zuiko 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6, Zuiko 40-150 f/4.0-5.6 R, Zuiko 15mm body-cap lens, Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, Zuiko 45mm f/1.8
Pentax Q; 01 prime, 02 and 06 zooms
Panasonic LX7
-
November 19th, 2012, 10:57 AM
#122
-
November 19th, 2012, 11:40 AM
#123
Like the focus in the second and the B & W :)
-
November 19th, 2012, 11:42 AM
#124
-
November 19th, 2012, 01:11 PM
#125
Okay, I finally pulled the rigger last night. B&H with one-day delivery. It should be in my sweaty hands this evening.
Panasonic G5 and GX1; Lumix 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6, Lumix 45-150mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 100-300mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 14mm f/2.5, Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Olympus E-PM2; Zuiko 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6, 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R, Zuiko 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6, Zuiko 40-150 f/4.0-5.6 R, Zuiko 15mm body-cap lens, Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, Zuiko 45mm f/1.8
Pentax Q; 01 prime, 02 and 06 zooms
Panasonic LX7
-
November 20th, 2012, 10:05 AM
#126
 Originally Posted by christilou
Nice. I noticed on Flickr that you had a square one of the same subject that's really nice as well. I'm wondering if this photo could be squared as well?
Square, if you haven't noticed, is my new thing LOL. I love the challenge of it, and the results...
-
November 20th, 2012, 10:05 AM
#127
-
November 20th, 2012, 12:00 PM
#128
Squared
I've been using the square format a lot this year and really like it for some quite surprising things! Here's a square crop in colour for a change. Not sure wether it loses some context without the shoulders though.
-
November 20th, 2012, 12:12 PM
#129
the colour is lovely (as usual with your processing), but I think the shoulder adds to it. Although I am also a big fan of the square crop in general. One great thing about squares, is super cheap decent size frames. Check out album art frames 12 inches square can usually be found on sale for around $10.
-
November 20th, 2012, 12:37 PM
#130
Yea, you're right, the should needs to peak and then start descending ever so slightly to be read as a shoulder. I'd be willing to sacrifice some of the hair on the left, pushing the forehead right to the edge of the frame, but that's just me. Still, it's a lovely shot.
 Originally Posted by christilou
I've been using the square format a lot this year and really like it for some quite surprising things! Here's a square crop in colour for a change. Not sure wether it loses some context without the shoulders though.

Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|