B&H Photo

LeicaPlace

Think Tank Photo

Introducing the New Retrospective®5 Camera Bag

Mu-43

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 80
Thank Tree22Thanks

Thread: Lightroom 4 slow slow slow - very disappointed [Updated 6 june 2012]

  1. #11
    BruPri is online now S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ballard, Washington USA
    Posts
    373
    Real Name
    Bruce J. Pritchard
    Works fine on my MacBook Air, I switched from Aperture which was starting to be sluggish, most notably when straightening a picture...

    again, LR4 seems fine.
    Bruce

    M9/Cron35 and OK, fine... now an RX1
    I think I'm done now.

  2. #12
    Amin Sabet's Avatar
    Amin Sabet is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,882
    Real Name
    Amin
    Hmmm... conflicting reports. Smells like a bug to me.
    Amin
    SeriousCompacts.com Webmaster (Site FAQ | Help Forum | My Disclosures | My Flickriver | My G+ Profile)


    Note: Links in this post may be to our affiliates. We get a small referral fee when you buy after clicking our link. Your price is unaffected.


  3. #13
    pictor's Avatar
    pictor is offline S.C. Top Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    851
    It's version 4.0 - I bet that version 4.1 will run more quickly.
    “It doesn’t matter what you look at, but what you see.” (Henry David Thoreau)

  4. #14
    olli is offline Super Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,533
    Real Name
    olli
    Running it on my more than 2 year old 4GB Sony Laptop. Can't say I've noticed any difference one way or the other.

  5. #15
    bilzmale's Avatar
    bilzmale is offline Super Moderator Emeritus Donor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    3,669
    I'm running a 3GHz quad AMD with 8GB of RAM and it is slower but not enough to think about not using it. I too am hoping 4.1 will address the issue.
    __________
    Bill Shinnick
    X100; RX100; GH2; G5{IR}.


  6. #16
    pdh
    pdh is offline SC Leading Farmer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,873
    Real Name
    Polly Warmtone
    Quote Originally Posted by Amin Sabet View Post
    Yn, people who buy Core i7 processors are probably more sensitive to performance
    .
    Perhaps, Amin ... but when I move a denoise slider and the whole machine slows and the processor fan comes on full-blast, or it takes 2 or 3 seconds for an zoomed image to draw (and yes, I do have my 1:1 previews built) ... well, not good, as I've said ... it is consistently amazing to me that companies the size of Adobe, who charge significant amounts of cash for their product, still manage to produce dogs like this ... and I speak as someone who spent a slab of his life having sign-off for software
    My photostream at Flickr.com is here
    "We can not shake the illusion of the truthfulness of photography" - William Gedney

  7. #17
    Julien is offline S.C. Top Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    751
    Real Name
    Julien
    I run LR4 beta on my Core 2 duo 1.3ghz (not a typo) / 4GB RAM laptop. Startup is slow, slower than LR3, but after that I don't find much performance difference with LR3 in normal use. It's not quick, but adequate for my needs, I rarely have to wait more than a second for any adjustment to be processed (contrary to Color Efex where it can take a while). Now it's a very very clean and optimized computer which probably has a lot to do with it (I work as a computer programmer and do 100% of my pro work on this machine, generally connected to an external monitor and wireless keyboard/mouse). I imagine I'm not very sensitive to performance

  8. #18
    Booka is offline S.C. Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    78
    I wasn't really interested in LR4 but the cheaper than anticipated upgrade price has me interested, maybe I'll wait for a little while to see how things work themselves out.

    Being somewhat of a noob with Lightroom I just learnt to create separate catalogs which greatly increased the speed of the program, having all 100gb of photos in one catalog became a real problem but now I've split them up and the program runs much more smoothly.

    Has transfering the catalogs and setting over to LR4 been an issue, i've heard that there are a few problems and you may loose a few changes.


  9. #19
    pdh
    pdh is offline SC Leading Farmer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,873
    Real Name
    Polly Warmtone
    Be interesting to know if those people not experiencing significant problems are running the 32- or 64-bit version?
    (I'm on 64-bit)
    My photostream at Flickr.com is here
    "We can not shake the illusion of the truthfulness of photography" - William Gedney

  10. #20
    bartjeej is offline S.C. All-Pro
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,558
    Real Name
    bart
    32-bit here (but as stated previously, running slowly on my netbook).

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

FTC Disclosure

This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0