B&H Photo

LeicaPlace

Think Tank Photo

Introducing the New Retrospective®5 Camera Bag

Mu-43

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
Thank Tree11Thanks

Thread: Long water exposures with the EM5

  1. #11
    tdp
    tdp is offline S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    469
    EM5, kit lens, no filter, multiple shots stacked as layers and screened


    Rapids by Photos By 夏天, on Flickr


    Rapids by Photos By 夏天, on Flickr


    Rapids by Photos By 夏天, on Flickr

  2. #12
    Luke's Avatar
    Luke is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI USA
    Posts
    4,852
    Real Name
    Luke
    Quote Originally Posted by tdp View Post
    EM5, kit lens, no filter, multiple shots stacked as layers and screened
    I'm not following this. I understand working with layers, but how is this effect achieved by layering multiple shots?


  3. #13
    tdp
    tdp is offline S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    469
    underexpose a few shots by -.7 to -1
    create a layer stack in Photoshop with each individual image on a layer
    leave the base layer alone
    the next layers set blend mode to screen, adjust level to taste


    Then I like to add contrast via all or some of these: curves layer, dodge/burn, soft light layer. Finally I sharpen and export.
    Thanked by Luke.

  4. #14
    PeterB666 is offline S.C. Top Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia, Australia
    Posts
    697
    Very nice photos.
    Cheers

    PeterB666


    Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Nikon D90. Cropped sensors rule!

    Click here to visit my blog!

    Click here to visit my photos on Flickr.

  5. #15
    Luke's Avatar
    Luke is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI USA
    Posts
    4,852
    Real Name
    Luke
    I may give this a shot..... I had never heard of this technique and I'm usually too lazy to haul the tripod along or I forget the ND filter. Thanks for the details.


  6. #16
    Djarum is offline S.C. Top Veteran Donor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    972
    Real Name
    Jason
    Wouldn't a few shots need over exposure to slow the water down?

  7. #17
    tdp
    tdp is offline S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    469
    Quote Originally Posted by Djarum View Post
    Wouldn't a few shots need over exposure to slow the water down?
    All you need to do to make the water look fluid is have a slow shutter speed. You can do that with ND filters, stopping your lens down, low ISO or merely a rather low lit situation. Even at a low ISO, a long exposure time will result in some noise. Playing with all the options above and your particular camera will result in finding what works best for you. With very rapid water and the magic of image stability, you can even pull it off handheld if you have a steady hand. Its digital, so mistakes are easily deleted :)

    At 30 seconds, ISO 200 and a variable ND filter set to pretty dark I got the motion results I wanted but I got some noise. Not too bad, but I am interested in perfecting my water shots with the EM5 so I can tuck that technique away in my photo bag of tricks. I later tried shorter exposure times and blended the images together. Not bad either, but not the same amount of motion as the 30 second exposures.

    There is a technique where you use Photoshop Extended to stack multiple shots as smart layers and let the computer do the math for the blend, but I do not have the Extended version of Photoshop. Below is a single shot I modified using the Orton effect, something usually used on flowers and people. It turned out ok as well.


    Orton by Photos By 夏天, on Flickr

  8. #18
    tdp
    tdp is offline S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    469
    Oh also if you overexpose your digital image the areas of bright white contain no almost no data, recovering detail in those areas with PP is near impossible. Most digital cameras do record a good amount of detail in the dark areas - that data is much easier to recover with software. Due to that, I think it is easier to go dark at the time of exposure then correct later with software. If you wanted to go overexposed then blend them down to the proper darker image, you would want to try the multiply option of your layer blending mode.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

FTC Disclosure

This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0