|
|
2Thanks
-
May 30th, 2011, 02:09 AM
#11
 Originally Posted by Luckypenguin
The Olympus convertor lenses will work the the E-PL2's kit lens (14-42 MkII), but not the E-PL1's (14-42 MkI). They are interchangable of course but by the time you've purchased an E-PL1 body and a 14-42 MkII lens seperately you probably wouldn't have saved much if at all compared to buying an E-PL2.
Ahhhhh, had not heard of those converters then :)
That would affect ones choices.
I have yet to handle an E-PL2 so I cannot comment on build quality.
-
May 30th, 2011, 02:21 AM
#12
I think the official Olympus convertors are a fisheye and a wide-angle. Haven't actually seen any images taken using them so I don't know how good they are.
Nic (Canonite, Olympian, Panasonian, Samsunite) ~flickr~
-
May 30th, 2011, 09:23 AM
#13
The other difference between the kit lenses is that the new Mark II version (on the E-PL2) also has the MSC designation (Movie and Still Compatible), meaning that it has very quick, quiet, internal focus (particularly important if you shoot video without an external mic). That's what allows the non-rotating front element to take the converters as well as a square bayonet lens hood.
Olympus E-3 | E-P1 PEN | E-PL2 PEN | Zuiko ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD | Zuiko 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 | Zuiko ED 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 | Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 pancake | m.Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 MSC | Olympus EC-14 teleconverter | Kenko Pro-1 filters | Olympus FL-36R speedlights | Olympus FL-50R speedlights | Cyclops Type-A and Type-B Flash Modifiers | Etsumi/Nikko Camera Bracket | Stroboframe Quickflip 350 flash bracket| Manfrotto background and light stands
cyclopsphoto.ca
-
May 30th, 2011, 09:45 AM
#14
 Originally Posted by Luckypenguin
I think the official Olympus convertors are a fisheye and a wide-angle.
Plus a macro converter. :) 3 in total.
Olympus E-3 | E-P1 PEN | E-PL2 PEN | Zuiko ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD | Zuiko 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 | Zuiko ED 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 | Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 pancake | m.Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 MSC | Olympus EC-14 teleconverter | Kenko Pro-1 filters | Olympus FL-36R speedlights | Olympus FL-50R speedlights | Cyclops Type-A and Type-B Flash Modifiers | Etsumi/Nikko Camera Bracket | Stroboframe Quickflip 350 flash bracket| Manfrotto background and light stands
cyclopsphoto.ca
-
May 30th, 2011, 01:26 PM
#15
 Originally Posted by Ned
The other difference between the kit lenses is that the new Mark II version (on the E-PL2) also has the MSC designation (Movie and Still Compatible), meaning that it has very quick, quiet, internal focus (particularly important if you shoot video without an external mic). That's what allows the non-rotating front element to take the converters as well as a square bayonet lens hood.
Ned that is indeed a big plus and I had forgotten that. My 14-150mm is so rated and it is indeed quick and silent.
-
May 30th, 2011, 02:43 PM
#16
Thanks again
for the further discussion. Had a play with both cameras at a local store - and I'm fairly well decided on the PL2 - defintely just tad faster AF, better LCD and the rotary dial was also somehting that until you handle the camera you dont appreciate the difference it makes.
There are some example pics with the converter lenses on DC Watch - and sharpness looks very good.
Hopefully will be paid out in the next week so I can make the purchase. It is like a dream to have a camera body the size of a canon G11 that takes lenses. Certainly wouldnt want much smaller as you need some area to access buttons and hold it comfortably.
-
June 20th, 2011, 06:38 AM
#17
The insurance payout is about to go through- and now there is the upcoming June 30 Olympus launch with three new cameras (let alone new lenses)- should I wait for the announcement - or get the E-PL2 kit anyway? And what about the G3 - becuse now I think an eye-level VF is something I've overlooked too casually-especially when son's soccer games are involved ... arrgghhh
-
June 20th, 2011, 07:11 AM
#18
June 30? darn. PMA Sydney is on this coming weekend. I wonder if they will have anything to show there. I saw an E-PL1 dead cheap the other day and I was really tempted. $200 cheaper than the XZ-1 was a HUGE temptation... but what held me back was the prospect of an E-PL3 or something similar.
Sue 
--------------------
Flickr | PPG | Blog
Gear: Mostly the Fuji X100, Ricoh GRD III and Olympus XZ-1
-
July 1st, 2011, 12:49 AM
#19
Why get 2 when you can have a 3
 Originally Posted by kyteflyer
June 30? darn. but what held me back was the prospect of an E-PL3 or something similar.
Same thing happened to me - I am leap-frogging the EPL2 and getting the 3rd generation.
I almost wonder if the number 4 will be on the shelves by Christmas ...
-
July 5th, 2011, 04:28 PM
#20
 Originally Posted by Lili
Ned that is indeed a big plus and I had forgotten that. My 14-150mm is so rated and it is indeed quick and silent.
Hi Lili - as your most dedicated follower . . . . I have now bought myself an E-PL2 to go with my XZ-1, together with the 14-150 lens, which is, indeed, quick and silent.
I've no idea how an E-PL2 compares with an E-PL1, but it's certainly an improvement on an EP-1 with the original firmware!
all the best
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|