Interesting point Kian, if much lens correction is introduced in software then how much filters through in to in-camera jpg production and how much is left out int raw files. The standard argument is that raw is "raw-data" but normally the raw file is accompanied by a metadata set of instructions that allows a raw file convertor to make an image that resembles the in-camera jpg when first loaded. Then of course you can play with the raw file data.
Therefore perhaps we can start to see real differences between in-camera jpg and exported raw? Taken to a logical conclusion and with a high enough level of in-camera correction maybe jpg might become better accepted?