B&H Photo

LeicaPlace

Think Tank Photo

Introducing the New Retrospective®5 Camera Bag

Mu-43

Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thank Tree5Thanks
  • 4 Post By Luke
  • 1 Post By nippa

Thread: X100S or X100?

  1. #1
    Biro's Avatar
    Biro is offline S.C. Top Veteran Donor
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Freehold, NJ
    Posts
    574
    Real Name
    Steve

    X100S or X100?

    So... the brand-new Fuji X100S for $1299 or a close-out X100 for... what? How much of a discount would it take for you to go for the X100, knowing its faults and the improvements offered by the X100S?
    Panasonic G5 and GX1; Lumix 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6, Lumix 45-150mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 100-300mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 14mm f/2.5, Lumix 20mm f/1.7

    Olympus E-PM2; Zuiko 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6, 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R, Zuiko 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6, Zuiko 40-150 f/4.0-5.6 R, Zuiko 15mm body-cap lens, Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, Zuiko 45mm f/1.8

    Pentax Q; 01 prime, 02 and 06 zooms

    Panasonic LX7

  2. #2
    demiro is offline S.C. Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    94
    Real Name
    Dean
    I doubt the close-out pricing on a new X100 would be low enough for me to choose it over the 100s, but when the X100 used prices crack the $500 mark they will be tough to pass up on.

  3. #3
    thekeddi's Avatar
    thekeddi is offline S.C. Top Veteran Donor
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    539
    If you have the cash then the x100s but used x100's should come down a bit unless they run thin on the ground and hold their prices?
    Current gear: Panasonic LX7, Fuji X100, Fuji X-E1, Fuji XP50


  4. #4
    kyteflyer's Avatar
    kyteflyer is offline S.C. Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Newcastle, Australia
    Posts
    3,688
    Real Name
    Sue
    If I didn't already have the X100, I'd get the S, not so much for its oh so fast AF *giggle* but for the other improvements. That said, I won't be in a rush to sell the one I have, I really am only coming to grips with it now, a year down the track. Its a keeper for me.
    Sue
    --------------------
    Fluidr Flickr |
    Flickriver Flickr |
    PPG | Blog
    Gear: Mostly the Fuji X100, Ricoh GRD III and Olympus XZ-1

  5. #5
    nippa is offline S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    301
    Real Name
    Dennis
    I'm impressed by the way Fuji hasn't spoilt the basic X100 but for me the X20 is a much more relevant camera.
    My X100 will continue to sit on the shelf gathering dust....I've never been a fan of the lens and that stays the same.

  6. #6
    Luke's Avatar
    Luke is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI USA
    Posts
    5,049
    Real Name
    Luke
    Quote Originally Posted by nippa View Post
    My X100 will continue to sit on the shelf gathering dust....I've never been a fan of the lens and that stays the same.
    I don't know how you can dislike the lens, but MORE than that....why not sell it instead of letting it collect dust and depreciate?

    To the original post, it depends on how fat your wallet is I suppose. I find nothing wrong with the X100. It does absolutely everything I ask of it. I would guess the X100 would drop to around $899. Nice used ones can often be had around $700. And when I say used ones, I mean pretty well unused, owned by a camera fetishist instead of a photographer....like new with many accessories.

    I won't be selling mine to buy the the new "S". It's more than good enough, and I'll put the extra dough in a vacation fund.


  7. #7
    nippa is offline S.C. Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    301
    Real Name
    Dennis
    Quote Originally Posted by Luke View Post
    I don't know how you can dislike the lens, but MORE than that....why not sell it instead of letting it collect dust and depreciate?
    I've spoken about the lens before. The softness at f2 is not to my liking and the change in resolution as the focus distance alters makes the use of f4 and f5.6 essential for high IQ.
    The contrast with the IQ from my Leica X1 and Canon G1X when opened up can be stark ..quite unlike the expectations I had after looking at Test Charts.
    What's worse is that Macro resolution only matches my LX5 at f8.
    The colours are gorgeous and it's a joy to handle but my other cameras provide sharper images with more "pop".

    I might dump it for a new X20 : for al its faults I've always loved using the X10.
    Thanked by Luke.

  8. #8
    Iansky is offline S.C. Top Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cotswolds, UK
    Posts
    599
    Like others I am very pleased to see that Fuji have not abandoned the X100 but have improved on it even more. I love my X100 and I am still impressed by the quality of build, tactile feedback and superb image quality - all positives.
    Ok, the first firmware was not good and AF was sluggish however as new updates were released the camera improved dramatically and it now does what I want it to do - it does need thought and patience to use but the end results justify the means.
    I think the X100s will be a hit as many still use it as opposed to going XPro-1 - I just hope the price is not prohibitive but to make their range viable they will need to keep it below that of the XPro-1 (unless of course they release an XPro-2?).
    All positive steps!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

FTC Disclosure

This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0