|
|
13Thanks
-
January 30th, 2013, 08:25 AM
#21
 Originally Posted by demiro
If Olympus can combine the XZ lens and design with a larger sensor (1" Sony or Canon GX1 size or m4/3s) it will have a serious camera. Basically an X100 mated with an X10. Trade off a little sensor size for 4X zoom range and fast lens. I'd buy that camera for E-M5 MSRP without hesitation.
If the XZ-10 is just an upgrade to the 2 with same small sensor then I am not interested.
Wow, my expectations were so far out of whack with what the XZ-10 is it's not even funny. While I suppose I understand the motivation behind this camera, I was really hoping that Olympus would take a serious shot at the RX100. Looks like the only company that may take that shot is Sony themselves. I'd love to see what they can stuff in to the body of the HX20V for example.
-
January 30th, 2013, 08:31 AM
#22
Nic (Canonite, Olympian, Panasonian, Samsunite) ~flickr~
-
January 30th, 2013, 08:42 AM
#23
Thanks Nic. I was going to link that in my post and totally forgot.
-
January 30th, 2013, 09:09 AM
#24
Oops. So much for ramping up to meet the challenge presented by the RX100. The XZ-2's cheaper little brother... Be interesting to see whether anyone who wants the kinds on control available with an "enthusiast" compact will be ok with a 1/2.3" sensor. I guess sensor tech is improving enough to make those sensors a bit more viable than they've been, but that's the same sized sensor available in every little cheap P&S on the market. And probably in smart phones as well??
-Ray
-
January 30th, 2013, 09:34 AM
#25
Yup, why would anyone pick this instead of XZ1 the same or less money? The cycles of new generations are so short that almost every used XZ1 is probaly mint:-)
-
January 30th, 2013, 09:40 AM
#26
 Originally Posted by pictogramax
Yup, why would anyone pick this instead of XZ1 the same or less money? The cycles of new generations are so short that almost every used XZ1 is probaly mint:-)
Wider lens. Newer processing engine. Smaller.
Armanius
My Flickr
Current Gear: A little bit of this and a little bit of that, but want more!
-
January 30th, 2013, 01:08 PM
#27
I was hoping for at the very least a 2/3" sensor, like the Fuji X10/20. Olympus may know more about viable market niches than I do, but I'm decidedly not in the niche market for this camera. I'll keep my eye on Fuji's X20 and enjoy the X10 meantime.
-
January 30th, 2013, 01:19 PM
#28
Armando, it's obvious how little is the world in which I live in (and in which none of those three things are appealing):-)
Others will of course feel differently, thanks for pointing it out!
-
January 30th, 2013, 01:33 PM
#29
 Originally Posted by Luckypenguin
Oh...
... crap :(
-
January 30th, 2013, 01:36 PM
#30
Well, I already have a Pentax Q so the Oly XZ-10 won't be required in my kit. But I'm keeping my eye out for the first credible review of the Fuji X20.... and X100s for that matter.
Panasonic G5 and GX1; Lumix 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6, Lumix 45-150mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 100-300mm f/4-5.6, Lumix 14mm f/2.5, Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Olympus E-PM2; Zuiko 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6, 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R, Zuiko 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6, Zuiko 40-150 f/4.0-5.6 R, Zuiko 15mm body-cap lens, Zuiko 17mm f/1.8, Zuiko 45mm f/1.8
Pentax Q; 01 prime, 02 and 06 zooms
Panasonic LX7
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
FTC Disclosure
This site uses affiliate programs and referral links for monetization.
|