P pdh Legend Jun 10, 2014 #1 No lenses, no pinholes, no apertures of any kind ... lumen b20140610-1 by _loupe, on Flickr
R ReD Hall of Famer Jun 10, 2014 #2 contact press glass? deserves more investigation - love the colours
bilzmale Hall of Famer Location Perth, Western Australia Name Bill Shinnick Jun 10, 2014 #3 Scanner? An attractive result.
R ReD Hall of Famer Jun 11, 2014 #4 ^ Possible but I think No as there is some sort of wet process here
P pdh Legend Jun 11, 2014 #5 A scanner was indeed used to digitise the image, but was not part of the process that produced the image. No processing chemicals were used, wet or dry ...
A scanner was indeed used to digitise the image, but was not part of the process that produced the image. No processing chemicals were used, wet or dry ...
R ReD Hall of Famer Jun 11, 2014 #6 Further reading is necessary In Meantime Cameraless photography - Google Search
ivoire All-Pro Location chicago burbs Name mike Jun 12, 2014 #7 Looks a bit like the flowers were pressed (maybe using iron/wax paper technique or a leaf press) and then scanned. Nice effect however it was done
Looks a bit like the flowers were pressed (maybe using iron/wax paper technique or a leaf press) and then scanned. Nice effect however it was done
drd1135 Zen Snapshooter Supporter Location Virginia Name Steve Jun 23, 2014 #15 Cyanotype printing? Kallitype? Platinum/palladium printing? Jedi mind printing?