DPReview on the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Discussion in 'Other >= 1" Sensor Cameras' started by Aushiker, Sep 12, 2017.

  1. drd1135

    drd1135 SC Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 13, 2011
    Lexington, Virginia
    Steve
    That's a beast of a camera. 38 oz, but the lens is 24-600. The full frame counterpart would be "hefty". :biggrin:
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2017
  2. bilzmale

    bilzmale Super Moderator Emeritus Subscribing Member

    Jul 17, 2010
    Perth, Western Australia
    Bill Shinnick
    It is now a real speed demon outclassing most dslr/mirrorless bodies. Having recently upgraded to the Mk III I'll not be buying this time.
     
    • Wow Wow x 1
  3. drd1135

    drd1135 SC Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 13, 2011
    Lexington, Virginia
    Steve
    C'mon, what else do you have to spend your money on?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. bilzmale

    bilzmale Super Moderator Emeritus Subscribing Member

    Jul 17, 2010
    Perth, Western Australia
    Bill Shinnick
    Just bought a new bass guitar after 12 years without one - I'm going to fight the progress of my PD. :drinks:
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. Aushiker

    Aushiker SC Veteran

    302
    May 20, 2017
    Fremantle, Western Australia
    Andrew
  6. tonyturley

    tonyturley SC Top Veteran

    839
    Nov 24, 2014
    Scott Depot, WV, USA
    Tony
    38 oz? That is a beast, indeed. Just for fun, here's a simulation comparing it to a Fuji X-T1 + 16-55 F2.8 WR. Exactly the same weight, but the Fuji lens is much shorter due to the physics of having the larger sensor. I think my back and neck would ache if I carried either setup on a hike or bike ride.

    Compact Camera Meter