My Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO Lens Review

Discussion in 'The Watering Hole' started by gryphon1911, Mar 1, 2015.

  1. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 SC Top Veteran

    540
    Feb 6, 2015
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    Looks like our work with the Olympus gear keeps increasing!

    For those who may not be aware, I had one of my images taken with Olympus gear used in an email advertisement and that same image may potentially be used in print ad campaigns. Given this, I had some talks with Olympus America (a great crew of people over there) and they gave me a great deal on the Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO lens.

    Out of all the zooms for Olympus, this is the one that I had most interest in using. For the wider to medium focal lengths, the primes seem to fit the bill quite nicely.

    I have coverage of the Arnold Classic coming up soon and this year decided with the acquisition of the Olympus gear that I would try to shoot it Olympus only.

    Last year I shot the Arnold with Nikon, using the 24 and 50 primes and the 80-200/2.8 zoom. We knew we would need a fast longer zoom, so we started looking. The 40-150/4-5.6 and 75-300/4.8-5.7 we already had would be too slow, so the 40-150/2.8 seemed like the perfect choice.

    Here are some sample images that will show the sizes of different 135 lenses versus the m43 40-150/2.8 PRO. Please forgive the crappy cellphone captures of the images. :D

    IMG_20150301_193405255_1.
    Left to right:
    Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 VC, Olympus 40-150/2.8 PRO, Nikon 80-200/2.8D
    No lens hoods

    IMG_20150301_193832106_1.
    Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 extends when zoomed. Olympus does not. The Tamron would not stay extended sitting in this position.

    IMG_20150301_193932111_1.
    Tamron 70-300 and Olympus with the hood added on.

    Before shooting any major events, I always like to test out new equipment. So first outing, took the lens to the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium.
    Remember that I don't do charts and pixel peeping. I review a lens based on what it is capable of providing me as an end result. Keep that in mind when reading further.

    Some notes:
    I did not get the chance to shoot this lens with the newest firmware on the OM-D EM-1. It was still version 2.2. A lot of the habitats have glassed in viewing areas. While better than fences in some instances, they tend to be very dirty and can degrade final image quality.

    Image Quality
    I can't really find a lot of fault with the IQ at any aperture or any focal length. You have your normal IQ drop off at f/11 and above due to diffraction, but beyond that, I find it stellar.

    The bokeh is also really nice and smooth.

    I think you can see from the sample images above, that shot wide open and in the challenging conditions, this lens is fantastic in the IQ department.

    02-28-2015_EM1_colzoo_P2280189-Edit-2.
    Nanuq and Aurora flirting
    1/1600, ISO 200, f/2.8 @ 46mm

    Handling
    First impression was that it feels an awful lot like shooting with the Nikon 80-200/2.8, but without the bulk.

    The zoom ring is smooth and dampened. It is a little stiffer than the 80-200, which I am able to change the focal length with one finger. The Olympus required a solid grip and turn, but you definitely will not move it accidentally.

    The focus ring is smooth and moves from one point to the other very quickly. I like the AF/MF clutch as well for those times when you want to quickly switch over to MF. No menu diving and you get the added bonus of snap focusing. For those curious, the MF ring does have hard stops at either end.

    02-28-2015_EM1_colzoo_P2280121-Edit.
    Mexican Wolves playing in the snow
    1/2000, ISO 200, f/2.8 @ 64mm

    Tripod Ring
    The tripod ring is convenient as it can be removed if you don't need it. What I like is the ability to rotate the ring all the way around the lens, so you can get it out of the way when you are shooting with it handheld. It also feels very stable, so should be solid when used on tripods.

    02-28-2015_EM1_colzoo_P2280169-Edit.
    Aurora the polar bear
    1/1600, ISO 200, f/2.8 @ 150mm

    Weight
    Compared to other m43 lenses, this one is on the heavy side. Compared to an APS-C or 135 equivalent f/2.8 lens, it is down right small and light.

    02-28-2015_EM1_colzoo_P2280005-Edit-Edit.
    Humbolt Penguins
    1/1250, ISO 200, f/2.8 @ 82mm (cropped)

    Auto Focus Speed
    Single point AF
    is lightning fast in all but the poorest of light. Even in poor light, though it is slow, but tends to hit the mark. There is some hunting, but only when the lighting is so dark it is hard to see your target with the naked eye.
    Continuous AF worked much better than expected, even given shooting through glass, which was our first shooting experience. With the EM1 firmware at 2.2, a DSLR is still going to out focus it. Once we get a chance to run it with the 3.0 firmware, we will let you know if there is a definite difference and what those differences are.

    As it stands, the AF is so good and quick that you can hit most sport shots with just that. CF was used without the tracking option and it was adequate for use in non-mission critical uses(again, with the 2.2 firmware). There were some missed sequences, but given the shooting conditions, I'm not sure if the misses were the lens, my lack of experience using the m43 C-AF systems or the dirty glass I was shooting through. If there is any deficiency that we find we will report it.

    02-28-2015_EM1_colzoo_P2280093-Edit.
    AF capable of keeping up with these running Mexican Wolves
    1/3200, f/2.8, ISO 800 @ 150mm(heavily cropped as well)

    Lens Hood
    I like the fact that the lens hood can be retracted with a twist of the ring. It stays locked in the deployed position until you use the ring. I wish it did the same when retracted. There were times just pulling the lens out of the bag that the hood would deploy. That is just me being nitpicky, though.

    Conclusion
    So far, just from this one day of shooting and seeing the results, I am sold on the capability of this lens. It is sharp, handles well, everything is in a great place and the AF performance is top notch. I'm not sure if Olympus could have made a better lens.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. serhan

    serhan SC All-Pro

    May 7, 2011
    NYC
    Thanks for the nice review and photos.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Armanius

    Armanius Bring Jack back!

    Jan 11, 2011
    Houston, Texas
    Jack
    Can't wait to see some Arnold photos!!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    Hmmm...A individual that I work with shoots for NPC News Online :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 SC Top Veteran

    540
    Feb 6, 2015
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    That's very cool!
     
  6. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 SC Top Veteran

    540
    Feb 6, 2015
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    • Like Like x 1
  7. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    Tks for posting! (Excellent B&W)
    One woman I know is an IFBB pro & another just started out in NPC Bikini.

    Saw Ferrigno in person last year - he looks fabulous for someone who's 60+

    Note To Self: Stay in da' gym and keep strong! :dance3:
     
  8. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    One last addendum.
    Picked up an early model 80-200 for my Dƒ

    It's no 70-200 but it was a whole LOT cheaper and still meets my needs :)
     
  9. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 SC Top Veteran

    540
    Feb 6, 2015
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    80-200 are great optical lenses. They are just heavy and lack VR. Both of which can be overcome.
     
  10. tdekany

    tdekany SC Veteran

    368
    Dec 21, 2011
    Portland OR
    I know pro body builders, and if Ferrigno is still looking good, that means he is still juicing - Just look at Arnold, who is obviously isn't anymore.
     
  11. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 SC Top Veteran

    540
    Feb 6, 2015
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    He's looking good for his age, but he is definitely not cracked like he used to be.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    We don't know that for sure....My father in law looks great in his 60s and he's never touched the stuff.
     
  13. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    Zane is looking good to for someone in his 70s!
     
  14. tdekany

    tdekany SC Veteran

    368
    Dec 21, 2011
    Portland OR
    I guess I am mistaken what you mean by still looking good.
     
  15. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    He looks good - nothing more/nothing less.
    I will not accuse him of something that I have no knowledge of...(innocent until proven guilty)
     
  16. tdekany

    tdekany SC Veteran

    368
    Dec 21, 2011
    Portland OR
    I am not accusing anyone either, but when I hear someone say that a former top body builder is still looking good, the first thought is juice. But maybe you just mean "healthy looking"?

    You may not know this, but most pro athletes are Type O blood. And for Os, exercise is medicine - so as long as they are pumping regularly, it will show.

    BTW, youtube Tom Plats. See what he used to look like and look at him in any recent video.
     
  17. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    I said nothing that would lead anyone to "juice".....And it's not my first thought....
     
  18. tdekany

    tdekany SC Veteran

    368
    Dec 21, 2011
    Portland OR
    Yes you did, but as I said, it depends on the circle you run in. I am sure I would have said the opposite about his appearance.
     
  19. RT Panther

    RT Panther SC All-Pro

    Dec 25, 2012
    Back on topic..
    Yep, the Olympus 40-150 is one HECKUVA lens! :clapping:
     
  20. gryphon1911

    gryphon1911 SC Top Veteran

    540
    Feb 6, 2015
    Central Ohio, USA
    Andrew
    Just as an update for those curious about the EM1 firmware update.

    This was only a quick test, but I shot around 100 shots, in bursts of cars, moving toward and away from me at around 15-30mph and going across the field of view at around 45mph. Shot at various focal lengths from all were 100% in focus.

    Given - there was minimal obstruction of the subjects - nothing really going between the subject and lens. Shot in C-AF, 9fps bursts at f/2.8 in good lighting.
    I'm not going to declare this the second coming or better than sliced bread just yet - I want to be able to shoot in a crowded frame first and see how that goes. So far very positive impression, though.

    Will need to see if I like how the C-AF with Tracking functions.
     
    • Like Like x 1