Has anyone having both a Fuji X camera [X100s, X-Ti, etc] and a Sony A [7, 7R, 7II etc..] compared the raw files and if so, which are better? Or are they similar? The reason I ask is my 7DII doesn't have the quality of raw that my X100s does which.. disturbs me. There is that kind of grain that you are good with, like in the Ricoh GR (a film quality grain), and that kind of grain you are not (for me the 7DII). Comparing my X100s raw.. which seems to have no grain until higher ISOs. I'm debating if I should go Sony [compatible with a lot of lenses via adapters] or even another Fuji. I can't afford full frame Canon unless it's the discontinued 6D due for an upgrade. I would rather not buy older tech. *I will be having my instructor go over the camera tomorrow to make sure it's just not a bad copy but I just think I've been spoiled by Fuji's raw algorithms. Even the canon jpeg processed in camera seem grainy. You'd think their software would be ideal for processing their own raw.