As you say "A quick summary" The pieces by Michael Reichmann at Luminous Landscape, give a longer more balanced (but not uncritical) account. Fujifilm X100 Test Report Fuji X100 Follow-Up
I just don't get his "sum ups". Most people have praised the GH2 and he seems not to like it. He also seems pretty mixed on the X100 too. Maybe he's the real traditional type that doesn't care to go outside the box a little. I dont know.
I just don't get his "sum ups". Most people have praised the GH2 and he seems not to like it. He also seems pretty mixed on the X100 too. Maybe he's the real traditional type that doesn't care to go outside the box a little. I dont know.
Actually, he tends to harp on the camera companies quite often for not innovating enough.
My read on his GH2 comment was that it isn't really all that much better than the GH1 ('cept for AF - he ammended his first analysis) and it's hard to find. Therefore, why not just buy a GH1 instead he says.
Actually, he tends to harp on the camera companies quite often for not innovating enough.
My read on his GH2 comment was that it isn't really all that much better than the GH1 ('cept for AF - he ammended his first analysis) and it's hard to find. Therefore, why not just buy a GH1 instead he says.
Again, sounds to me like more a review/commentary on the company than the camera itself. Just because the camera is hard to find doesn't mean it is a bad camera.
Again, sounds to me like more a review/commentary on the company than the camera itself. Just because the camera is hard to find doesn't mean it is a bad camera.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content and to keep you logged in when you join. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.