X-E1 vs Sony NEX-6 Shootout Video

Discussion in 'Fuji X Forum' started by TCSJordan, Nov 20, 2012.

  1. TCSJordan

    TCSJordan SC Regular

    Oct 22, 2011
    Hey guys,

    I thought you might find this video interesting. We'd already looked at a pre-production X-E1 briefly, but this was the first time the TCSTV crew were able to field test it. We also brought the new NEX-6 for comparison.


    Let me know what you think!

    • Like Like x 3
  2. Kin Lau

    Kin Lau SC Regular

    Oct 23, 2012
    Very cool, I just finished watching that before I saw your message. That's a very useful comparison, I learned a few thing I didn't know about those two cameras.
  3. adanac

    adanac SC Veteran

    Sep 30, 2011
    Vancouver, BC
    Had the X-E1 been out last fall, I might well have bought one instead of the GXR, just to gain access to a more modern sensor.

    Ok, now lets pit the X-E1 with a native Fujifilm 35mm equivalent field of view lens - one of the most popular prime focal lengths, against the Sony.

    Oh... no 23mm prime yet for the X mount?

    Pity! :wink:

    PS: Maybe the NEX-7 might have been a better match?
    • Like Like x 1
  4. wt21

    wt21 SC Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Aug 15, 2010
    Very enjoyable video and very informative too. Not just the typical "walk-and-talk" type of video review.

    You missed on stage though -- post production in your favorite environment (using LR for example), though I hear Fuji is working with Adobe to address their issues.
  5. Luckypenguin

    Luckypenguin SC Hall of Famer

    Dec 24, 2010
    Brisbane, Australia
    I always enjoy the TCS videos. Nice comparison between the two cameras
  6. drewbot

    drewbot SC Rookie

    Nov 10, 2012
    I'm afraid to know what the 23 f/1.4 will cost. The thing looks large, which would hopefully imply good edge performance. But all at a cost. So long as it isn't too much more than an X100 used.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. flysurfer

    flysurfer SC Top Veteran

    Aug 31, 2011
    As long as it's smaller, lighter and cheaper than a optically comparable 2.0/35mm for Canon or Nikon "full frame" DSLRs, I'm happy.
  8. drewbot

    drewbot SC Rookie

    Nov 10, 2012
    That should be pretty easy. The Nikkor 35/D and Canon EF 35 f/2 aren't exactly stars in their lineup (on digital sensors).
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Wolf

    Wolf SC Veteran

    Mar 4, 2012
    I have both cameras and they are both great in their own way.
    The XE-1 might be more fun to use, but sometimes more frustating too
    the nex 6 is faster in general (AF) and much better for video

    But the "problem" I got is...
    I really want a 23mm lens

    Should i go for the Zeiss for nex @ 940 euro or wait for the fuji?
    Both have no stabilisation, but the fuji will be 1.4 and might be cheaper then the zeiss? Since the 35mm fuji is "only" 499 euro (and that lens is 1.4 too)

    Any advice ?
    OR just wait a few more months ? ;)
  10. ajramirez

    ajramirez SC Hall of Famer Subscribing Member

    Jul 9, 2010
    Caguas, Puerto Rico
    But, we need to wait and see what the new Canon EF 35mm 2.0 IS USM brings to the table...At three times the price of the old one, of course.
    • Like Like x 1